Comments on: Judge Who Threw Out Motorola V. Apple Thinks We Don’t Even Need Software Patents

By: Ali husain

Ali husain — Thu, 01 Nov 2012 19:30:00 +0000

Fantastic Excellent. My best friend’s sister-in-law brought in $19426 the prior week. All she did was get fortunate and follow the instructions exposed on this web site http://Run16.com. Go there and accept any offer.

By: Smart Man

Smart Man — Thu, 20 Sep 2012 03:27:00 +0000

Don’t bite the apple! Look what it did to Snow White…

By: Roger

Roger — Fri, 06 Jul 2012 14:12:00 +0000

Hey, I don’t mean to be off topic, but doesn’t this guy look like Larry David from curb your enthusiasm?

By: russ

russ — Fri, 06 Jul 2012 11:31:00 +0000

“an” adult

By: GotNitro

GotNitro — Fri, 06 Jul 2012 10:54:00 +0000

Is that Larry David?

By: Guest

Guest — Fri, 06 Jul 2012 08:08:00 +0000

Karl Benz had patent on the internal combustion engine, if you think patents on such stuff never existed thats just plain ignorant. The patents just holds for a limeted time to get others a chanse to compete. The difference her is that technology moves too fast for anyone to have a 3-5 year patent, maybe a mounth at most. That would probably earn you enought lead.

By: michael arazan

michael arazan — Fri, 06 Jul 2012 07:01:00 +0000

Need to get the case against the nexus and apple infront of this guy.

By: CollinR4

CollinR4 — Fri, 06 Jul 2012 03:30:00 +0000

He posted these pictures in the opinion on a case he presided over. I think that says it all.http://www.abajournal.com/news/article/posner_opinion_includes_ostrich_photo_to_portray_lawyers_who_ignore_precede/

By: Tyler Chappell

Tyler Chappell — Fri, 06 Jul 2012 03:28:00 +0000

The problem is, that with the way software works and how it basically follows a set of rules, it is way too easy for two software developers on opposite ends of the world to actually write the same code, even without having ever seen each other’s That’s just the way it is, certain variable names and method names etc may be different, even though they perform the exact same function. This is why software absolutely shouldnt be patented, maybe if someone comes up with a brand new software language, that might be a different story, but when you’re a programmer trying to get things done through code, the most efficient ways will usually be pretty damn similar.

By: Guest__Comment

Guest__Comment — Fri, 06 Jul 2012 02:46:00 +0000

If I’m the first person to add a certain feature to my software… can no one else in the world ever write THEIR OWN CODE to have the same feature in their software?

I think the key is the wording “write THEIR OWN CODE”.

They can’t STEAL my actual code. But should they NEVER be allowed to write their own code either?

By: Andrew Horton

Andrew Horton — Fri, 06 Jul 2012 02:16:00 +0000

it’s so good that they’re putting it on their computers… But I suppose Apple didn’t copy this from android… they created it… HAHA, yeah right!

By: Andrew Horton

Andrew Horton — Fri, 06 Jul 2012 02:15:00 +0000

except for notification bar, right? That came from android…

By: Andrew Horton

Andrew Horton — Fri, 06 Jul 2012 02:12:00 +0000

I partly agree… But code is like an ‘alphabet’ for writing software… Sometimes the easiest way to write code might duplicate another’s code… I don’t understand the point of a company being able to copyright writing code. If it’s direct copy and paste, and looks the same ‘on screen’ sure… I think as long as the implementation ‘on screen’ is different, it shouldn’t matter.

By: Slate Jones

Slate Jones — Fri, 06 Jul 2012 01:47:00 +0000

wait… what?… I dont get it. I know that has to be a joke…

By: EvanTheGamer

EvanTheGamer — Thu, 05 Jul 2012 23:29:00 +0000

Right.