Comments on: At Time of Release, Google Glasses May Not Be the Full Augmented UI We See in Promos

By: Joe Cross

Joe Cross — Wed, 16 May 2012 03:32:00 +0000

I feel like if they have employees wearing them in public and to television interviews that they post pictures of on G+ from the glasses then they have to be pretty far along

By: Pursuit

Pursuit — Wed, 16 May 2012 00:08:00 +0000

hmmm… And you guys are self conscious putting a not up to your ear, but now you guys are all for this external retainer for your eyes. wtf I don’t get it. Looks terrible. Please explain

By: PC_Tool

PC_Tool — Tue, 15 May 2012 21:03:00 +0000

Like fine velvet, actually.

True story.

By: Droidzilla

Droidzilla — Tue, 15 May 2012 20:59:00 +0000

What?! 9000?! The Google Glass must be broken.

By: El Big CHRIS

El Big CHRIS — Tue, 15 May 2012 20:32:00 +0000

seriously, someone should make a game that shows the power level and by playing (doing something) you can increase the level all the way to 9000!

By: Liderc

Liderc — Tue, 15 May 2012 20:15:00 +0000

What was that you said about thin skin? heh

By: PC_Tool

PC_Tool — Tue, 15 May 2012 20:12:00 +0000

Holy…

I commented on the logic…don’t care about the product…made no accusations…but whatever…

This has already gone too far. F*ck it. Whatever.

By: will bartlett

will bartlett — Tue, 15 May 2012 20:05:00 +0000

the glasses are totally viable. they just need to build on what they can do right now. they are limited by tech. it doesnt take a scholar to see that.

By: PanicsWhenUbered

PanicsWhenUbered — Tue, 15 May 2012 20:05:00 +0000

Why is Google trying to develop an entirely separate device for Google Glasses? Why not just deeply integrate the Google Glasses system into the next gen of Android and have the glasses be a wirelessly connected peripheral for our phone?

By: Liderc

Liderc — Tue, 15 May 2012 19:46:00 +0000

I think you need to look up what troll means:

a troll is someone who posts inflammatory, extraneous, or off-topic message in an online community…with the primary intent of provoking readers into an emotional response or of otherwise disrupting normal on-topic discussion.

I’m discussing the post, the product in the post and my opinion of said post. My intention is not to enrage other’s, simply to voice my opinion of the products viability, which is fairly relevant considering the article is about it being released without many of the UI elements we’ve been seeing.

By: will bartlett

will bartlett — Tue, 15 May 2012 19:41:00 +0000

still being a troll though

By: will bartlett

will bartlett — Tue, 15 May 2012 19:41:00 +0000

still being a troll though

By: Liderc

Liderc — Tue, 15 May 2012 19:33:00 +0000

I don’t have thin skin, quite the opposite. I was just pointing out that you were involving yourself in a conversation where you weren’t even aware of the product’s supposed abilities. Then you attempted to act like you didn’t care, yet you involved yourself in the conversation, now you’re attempting to act like I have thin skin because I respond to your accusations.

Apparently defending one’s opinion is the result of thin skin. Funny, I’ve always seen it as someone who’s willing to have a voice.

By: PC_Tool

PC_Tool — Tue, 15 May 2012 19:26:00 +0000

*laughing*

Damn. Some people have seriously thin skin today. Sorry, man. Didn’t mean to get ya all upset. Just found the “never used it’ bit amusing…

…my bad.

By: LiterofCola

LiterofCola — Tue, 15 May 2012 19:25:00 +0000

I would suspect both in his case.