More Reading

Post navigation

12 Comments

  • It’s cool that they’re expanding, but YouTube TV won’t really be viable for me until they strike a deal with Turner & Viacom.

    • Gℴℴgle pays to people of every age 98 dollars/h to complete some jobs on the laptop .. Do job only for only few peroid of time in a day and have greater time together with your relatives … Anyone can catch online jobs plan…on Monday I got a great Buick after I been making $9568 this past month .it’s certainly nicest-work but you can now not forgive yourself if you don’t test it.!hh751a:➧➧➧➧ http://GoogleHomeDigiWorkFromHome/online/easytasks… ♥♥g♥♥♥c♥d♥♥n♥f♥♥♥k♥s♥♥h♥♥♥v♥♥♥b♥♥♥z♥♥w♥♥♥r♥l♥u♥♥y♥♥♥l♥♥♥c♥♥h♥♥♥e♥♥s♥♥e♥♥♥o♥♥q♥l:::::!vh461q:w

  • I already have YouTube TV but this doesn’t excite me at all. Its only soccer, if it was a sport that I cared about then I would be excited.

  • Why its stupid:
    *Not everyone willing to cut the cord.
    *Even if you are, may want different streaming service
    *Limited channel lineup compared to other services
    *Very limited Spanish speaking sports networks (No unimas/univision/fox deportes) What about ur spanish speaking base?

    I have YouTube TV and it sucks that I can’t catch New York Red Bulls games because there’s no MSG Network. But at least I have options elsewhere. This being your only option and a limited one at that seems pretty dumb.

    • Agreed. While on one hand this is great for an MLS fan who wants to cut the cord and is looking at Youtube TV, on the other I could see this introducing more fragmentation for sports fans. I cut the cord and didn’t grab Youtube TV partially because it doesn’t have MSG for the Devils/Red Bulls or SNY for the Mets.

      Could you imagine though if more teams started to do this across different services? What if you needed to sign up for Youtube TV to watch LAFC and the Clippers, but you needed Hulu Live TV for the Angels, and DirectTV Now for the Rams and Ducks? It would be worse than cable at that point.

Comments are closed.

back to top