Dude, people are referring to the top and bottom. Everyone knows there has to be a side bezel.

An idiotic reply to my comment? Interesting… I think your on to something yourself.

For those of you who aren’t retarded, I was referring to a full-size screen with little to no bezel. This is why I mentioned “incorporating something into the touchscreen” in my post. I clarify upon my original post for CaptainObviouslyStupid here… I am suggesting that the active, touch-sensitive screen go as close to the edge as possible for maximum viewing area, BUT to avoid accidental touches from registering along the edges you could have the “deadzone” I mentioned. This was you could minimize or eliminate the solid black bezel and see more of the screen for games or movies. You could hold the active screen along the edge without it interfering with what you are doing.

It’s not a perfect solution and might not even be possible. I just thought I would share a possibly innovative idea with the rest of us on here who use our brains intelligibly.

I understand your argument but why would it be that much wider than the side bezel? If it’s not meant to be held in portrait mode than why advertise it that way? It just looks odd that the bezel isn’t consistent around the screen.

That makes sense.