More Reading

Post navigation

30 Comments

  • They won’t get a cent from me until they offer 4K HDR. That’s unacceptable to be a “premium” service and only offer HD. Nope!

  • I’ve had HBO for free as a promotion many times and never watched it. 99% of what Hollywood produces today is garbage.

  • Having had HBO since the last promotion at this price I kind of feel like this should be the regular price. I really enjoy the programming but I feel like you can get pretty caught up on the better shows fairly quickly then the new stuff trickles in slower. I don’t see this as having the same value as say Netflix 4K HDR version at the same price which has a ton of more content (obviously much more junk too but arguably more value/programming depending on the person I guess). I am not sure I will continue to oay for HBO once the price is 15 bucks a month but for some reason 12 feels acceptable for now but at 10 bucks I feel I would keep it even longer with less reservation.

  • Roku, Amazon, and HBO really need to work out their issues. It’s pretty ridiculous they haven’t worked things out at this point.

    • AT&T too (remember, AT&T owns HBO/Warner Media)

      Still cannot get AT&T TV on Roku. I know of 2 people who even had the good grandfathered AT&T/DirectTV Now plan and dropped it and went to YouTube TV simply because of the endless Roku/AT&T disputes. I have seen tons of Peacock complaints lately too regarding their lack of Roku or FireTV integration.

      I am holding the line with Hulu, Netflix, Prime, and Disney Plus.

    • This is really on AT&T. Roku makes its money on services paying to be on the platform not on the devices. AT&T won’t pay. AT&T is being really stupid. AT&T has deep pockets and can easily pay Roku and it’s in AT&T’s best interest.

  • It looks like HBO really wants HBO Max to get more subscribers but they aren’t willing to do the one thing that would help most. Add Roku and Fire TV support.

    • Yep. Only reason I haven’t subscribed. They can drop the price down to $3, and I still wouldn’t because I don’t want to watch HBO on any other device or have more steps than needed to watch something.

      • I have HBO Max but I already pay for HBO through DirecTV and since DirecTV is owned by AT&T I get HBO Max. I’m just waiting for Roku to have HBO Max to drop DirecTV which I’ve thinking about doing for a while.

  • Just for the record this doesn’t work if you’re paying through Google. Only if you subscribe directly through the HBO Website

    • Same situation with YouTube TV. I can’t use the YouTube TV HBO channels because I bought this deal directly on HBO’s site last time. I figure I’ll cancel there and start paying on YouTube TV once the promo ends.

  • Still not worth it.
    $13 for HBO, $7 for Disney, $13 for Netflix, $5 for Peacock, $6 for CBS, etc…..by the time you add them all up you may as well pay the $50 for cable and their 100 channels. So much for the dream of cord cutting from 5 years ago when people thought they could just get Hulu and be satisfied.

    • Most people aren’t paying for all of those random services. Who’s paying for CBS and Peacock? I even canceled my Disney Plus. People don’t need every service that’s the point.

      • I pay for CBS All Access for maybe two months a year. Star Trek Discovery, Star Trek Picard, Star Trek Lower Decks and The Twilight Zone are all good. I just wait for several seasons to be done and then pay for a month.

        • That use case does makes sense. I should have been more specific, and asked who would pay for CBS on an ongoing, monthly basis.

    • $50 for cable will not get u HBO, Cinemax, or any on demand movies like disney and netflix.

    • Yep. I dumped everything except for SlingTV last year. It got ridiculous. I do have Apple TV since I just got a new laptop this year. And since I’m a Comcast Internet customer, they provide Peacock. But both of those services are rarely used.

Comments are closed.

back to top