More Reading

Post navigation

6 Comments

  • Redundantly stupid. Private Space will be secured by biometrics or password….like the actual phone is? If one can get into the phone with biometrics or password then surely they can get into the Private Space. Be better to just encrypt the entire phone.

    But good to see Google is trying to return to innovation. A better new product is Google’s NotebookLM that went public this past week.

  • so the point of this is if another person is using my phone, then they cannot access certain features that I want behind some security?

    if I don’t trust a person to use all features and apps installed on my phone, then they don’t get to use my phone. at this point in time, a phone is an extension of a wallet, and yeah, I don’t just go handing that out to people I don’t trust.

    this is a useless feature for Samsung, and a useless feature for Android.

  • A publicly known secure folder is actually a honey trap. You should NEVER “hide” anything in a secure folder that is public information.

    A.) It is the first place anyone will look
    B.) You can be forced to open it or your biometrics will be used to open it

    If you want to secure information, use a lockbox that supports obfuscated tiered security hidden as a random system folder so breach of a first level doesn’t breach all levels.

    • If you want to secure information, use a lockbox that supports obfuscated tiered security hidden as a random system folder so breach of a first level doesn’t breach all levels.

      Sounds like you have a product in mind??

      • VeraCrypt already does everything he is talking about. It’s called something else in Android.

Comments are closed.

back to top