More Reading

Post navigation

Previous Post

HTC One (M8) Review

HTC is back this year, with a new flagship device titled the One (M8).…

34 Comments

  • Dropbox and Drive seem to get all of the press, but I got in on the 50GB free from box.com so I tend to sue that the most.
    Anyone recommend any good apps for syncing folders between 2 devices via box? You can upload and download via there app, but I have yet to get automatic syncing to work the way that I want it to.

  • If you set G+ photos to upload at full size (one dimension larger than 2048px), it will upload them to your Drive storage instead of the unlimited autobackup storage

    • Yes, and no; from the meat of the article itself: “Google offers automatic upload functionality with Google+ (which uses the same storage plan as Drive if you want to upload full sized photos and videos), but photos uploaded on Google+ are not visible in Google Drive (though you can make photos in Drive appear in Plus).”

      Just checked and verified this locally. So it’s not really a complete solution to the problem.

  • Thanks for the tip. Purchased the app without hesitation based upon this review. Works as claimed. Never did feel safe relying on Google+. Always worried about how I would move my photos to another cloud service one day. And didn’t like worrying about privacy settings all the time

  • If you delete pics/videos from your phone, will this app also delete them from Drive? That is a huge feature that the built-in G+ cloud sync is missing.

      • Well the author is conjecturing that there is a difference in reliability between the two Google services, Google + photos & Drive, but they are both Google and it just seems silly to have more trust in Drive than Google + in terms of long term reliability.

        They are both using the same back end of storage I’m sure.

        • He definitely addressed this issue… I have the same issue (though it doesn’t bother me too much). Google plus backup is all online while drive is both backed up on your local desktop and the cloud.

        • I am the author. I wasn’t trying to say that Google+ is less reliable, but rather that it was designed to share things, not store them. It can do it, but I don’t trust it for that purpose for that and other reasons.

          • I don’t get it. Google+ photos is Google Drive at the storage level. Is the big benefit that you see filenames in drive and not a gallery like google+? Otherwise I don’t get the point of paying $5 for this.

          • The big benefit is that you have control of where your photos are and how to organize them. Using Google+ puts them in Google+ only, but using Drive lets you sync your photos to any computer as a local backup and lets you organize your photos in folders, etc. Another added benefit of using Drive is that you don’t have to worry about privacy settings; G+ is designed to share photos, Drive is designed to store them (and other things). Like you said, Drive and G+ technically share the same storage plan, but files uploaded to G+ don’t show up in Drive, meaning you can’t sync them off of Google’s servers and onto your computer easily. If you don’t care about privacy and you don’t care that Google+ is the only place with all of your photos, save your money. If you want to have multiple backups of your photos and have control over where they are, spend the $5 and store them on Drive instead of on G+.

          • Well said. I can’t stand the fact that G+ doesn’t allow me to organize my photos the way I want. You can’t even sort albums for crying out loud! Drive has been an absolute godsend for photo organization, findability, and backup.

          • I agree with the initial nervousness about how the Google+ auto-backup folder looks like a normal album. But the auto-backup gallery is private, and you can’t change the privacy permissions for it, nor any photos in it.

            If you want to share a photo it will be copied to a shared album. If you share from auto-backup and don’t specify where, it gets copied to the “photos from posts” album which is kind of the catch-all and you’ll see a “post” on your Google+ stream. You have to look at the post to figure out who it’s shared with, and I don’t see any way to see who a photo is shared with from the photo itself.

            The problem is that Google+ does not make any of this terribly obvious, and I hope it’s still a work in progress.

            If I were google, I’d put a “private” border color around any private photos, just to be very clear, and re-work the Photos from Posts album to make it easy to see who every photo is shared with from within the album.

        • The big difference for me is that Google Drive is installed on my PC, Google+ is not. Something I upload to Drive from my phone will automatically be copied to my PC. Thus I have a cloud copy, and a local copy. Google+ does not work that way.

  • Drive is good for the unlimited auto backup pics but it sucks balls when trying to share content. People shouldn’t need to login to view a pic and all that jazz

  • Also, I would switch to Google Drive except we use it at work and the startling array of bugs, sync failures, and the inability to share a link with anyone who doesn’t have a Google account makes it an awful experience. (You can share the link, but they need to login with a Google account to download. Unacceptable.)

    Dropbox > SkyDrive > Box >>>>Drive

    • I haven’t had any sync issues or bugs so far (knock on wood), but I’ve certainly seen a lot of people complain about them. I’m most curious to see if and how Dropbox will respond to the price drop.

    • You can share with people who don’t have Google accounts but since you are using it at work they may have this disabled.

  • Or you can use Dropbox to autosync and then when you start to run out of space on dropbox transfer them to Google Drive.. Thats what i do 🙂

Comments are closed.

back to top