Comments on: Samsung Developing New Pixel Technologies For Upcoming Devices

By: JoshGroff

JoshGroff — Thu, 24 Jan 2013 18:27:00 +0000

When I hold my phone 1 inch away from my eye, the brightness hurts.

By: Adam Marr

Adam Marr — Thu, 24 Jan 2013 16:36:00 +0000

Maybe you should do a bit of research before making such claims. “Perfect” vision (20/12) requires around 477 ppi to be “retina-quality” if you want to use that term. High ppi displays can also utilize pixels as “subpixels” allowing for 48bit color depth. Higher ppi displays can also make text easier to read even when the eye cannot distinguish individual pixels. The constant ranting and ridiculous analogies about half the comments on here are based on a single statistic ignoring all other facts. Thus, wanna-be vision acuity experts because they read a sentence on maximum ppi (for “average” good vision) without really understanding the details.

By: dsass600

dsass600 — Thu, 24 Jan 2013 12:06:00 +0000

Just look it up dude there are a ton of articles by eye doctors giving their word that you can most definitely see pixels at ≈300 PPI.

By: Tim242

Tim242 — Thu, 24 Jan 2013 11:43:00 +0000

Source?

By: dsass600

dsass600 — Thu, 24 Jan 2013 11:36:00 +0000

Actually apple was debunked on that one a couple of days after the release of the iPhone 4. The true PPI limit is around 440-480.

By: Tim242

Tim242 — Thu, 24 Jan 2013 11:13:00 +0000

Not according to every single reviewer…and science.

By: dsass600

dsass600 — Thu, 24 Jan 2013 05:42:00 +0000

Yes they are…

By: skinja

skinja — Thu, 24 Jan 2013 05:15:00 +0000

It is so weird when people complain about the PPI being too high. It is like complaining that the CPU is too fast. Who cares if the consumer doesn’t notice much difference. KEEP PUSHING the technology. Don’t stifle it and say ‘good enough’

You are honestly advocating the screens remain stationary.

By: Sofia Samme

Sofia Samme — Thu, 24 Jan 2013 03:22:00 +0000

Cool, Apparently most are a watch specialist currently as a result of they scan a brief paragraph description on http://tiny.cc/5baerw and get ideas whats good for them

By: S2556

S2556 — Wed, 23 Jan 2013 22:20:00 +0000

this is innovation. why would you not want R&D into a better technology? If we stuck with good enough hardware and stopped trying to create the next great hardware we would be on phones like the rezound now instead of the beasts that are the super phones of 2013

By: Kleverson Royther

Kleverson Royther — Wed, 23 Jan 2013 22:18:00 +0000

I’ve thought of that too, but then figured out that it would be better to have the same bigger battery on a 720p screen and the world would not complain that every smartphone these days has a short battery life…

By: lamaz

lamaz — Wed, 23 Jan 2013 22:12:00 +0000

Make one standard. It’s better for everyone.
4 “and under qHD
4 “to 5″ 720p (even better 800)
5 “+ 1080P

By: David Bavin

David Bavin — Wed, 23 Jan 2013 22:11:00 +0000

What’s wrong with overkill? It will come with a bigger battery. Boom. You wouldn’t be complaining if you had it. I wouldn’t be complaining if my phone have 100GB of RAM. Yes it’s definitely overkill and I definitely won’t use all of it, but I’d still have it.

It’s like having a car with a top speed of 253 mph. You definitely won’t reach that speed on a daily basis for sure, but there may be that one day that you will be able to enjoy it.

You wouldn’t be complaining if you had it.

By: Tim242

Tim242 — Wed, 23 Jan 2013 22:02:00 +0000

The HTC One X is 312 PPI. Pixels are not visible on it.

By: Kleverson Royther

Kleverson Royther — Wed, 23 Jan 2013 22:01:00 +0000

Because seeing the pixels is the only difference related to pixel density. The others are related to display technology.