Home

Share this Story

Leaked Press Image Shows Off White Motorola DROID RAZR M

We pretty much know everything there is to know about Verizon’s upcoming DROID RAZR M. It has a 4.3″ qHD display, is powered by a 1.5GHz Snapdragon S4 chip, 1GB of RAM and Ice Cream Sandwich. Until recently, we knew it would make its debut in two colors (black and white), but no images were seen of the white variant. Not the case anymore. Above is the white RAZR M that will be announced by Motorola on September 5 in NYC.

Liking the look so far?

Via: Engadget

  • http://twitter.com/Vizualize a.d.AM

    This looks like crapware from Asia circa 2009. Kevlar stickers and all. Hopefully this is the last abomination the old Motorola “design” team pinched out before Google bought them.

  • http://twitter.com/Xeneize480 Xeneize480

    junk!

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000813438259 Jason Kocian

    Watch out Apple might have a patent on white phones.

  • AhsanS

    TBH, it looks ugly.

  • jldleo

    “Groundhog day”

  • Aaa

    I think the RAZR HD and the Galaxy Note 2 will come out at roughly the same time, and assuming leaks are correct and both will be on Verizon, its tough to say which one is better for someone who doesn’t root. (JB out of box, but new Blur > Touchwiz, but 2gb RAM + bigger battery, but build quality/radio reliability)

  • DroidJ

    This looks like a commodity phone.

  • NemaCystX

    here we go again with the colors. I think the RAZR had like 5

    Black/White/Red/Blue/Purple

  • kixofmyg0t

    Hey that looks awfully familiar…..

  • Naga Appani

    This looks a bit ugly, ain’t it?

  • http://profiles.google.com/johnslangster John Lang

    I think these come free when you buy your kids a back to school lunchbox this year. This thing looks like garbage. Razr Maxx is their best phone, maybe a Droid4 Maxx instead?
    with a large screen?

  • MotoRulz

    Dear Motorola,
    Please step outside your comfort zone and do something COMPLETELY different.
    Sincerely Motorola fan

  • http://profiles.google.com/adamtruelove Adam Truelove

    Wow, this is the first Moto device I actually like the look of. Very simple, no physical buttons, a fairly small bezel. The complete opposite of most of their phones. Just get rid of the Motorola and Verizon logos and it’s a winner.

    Oh, and BTW, I mean the look of the phone is a winner. The fact that it’ll probably be running motoblur and has a qHD screen makes it a no buy, but at least it looks nice.

    • http://asten77.myopenid.com/ Asten

      As awful as blur used to be, it seems every iteration they give up a little more. My Atrix’s Blur is so-so, but largely widgets so easy to turn off, and the Atrix HD could almost pass as a stock device. Almost.

      • http://profiles.google.com/adamtruelove Adam Truelove

        It’s the “almost” that doesn’t do it for me. I’m not going to buy a Porsche with Kia body panels. If it’s “almost” stock, why not just use stock?

  • bkosh84

    You have to remember, these phones were probably in development before Google took over and they figured they put in that much money into development, they might as well sell them and try to make back the money they spent behind the scenes.. At least I hope that is what is happening, lol.

  • Leo

    Any news on the galaxy note 2?

  • spickle

    i don’t get it, why so many versions of the RAZR? RAZR, RAZR MAXX, RAZR HD, RAZR M?

    • mustbepbs

      Because Motorola didn’t learn the first time around.

    • r0lct

      Because BMW would have sued if then made the Droid X3? Oh wait wrong company.

    • NemaCystX

      If you recall, the RAZR was to be “reinvented” into a new line of phones. remember the original RAZR? it branched off into devices like the ROKR, KRAZR, which probably caused consumer confusion so Motorola is probably milking the market this time by keeping the same name for all the devices in the family

  • Gus

    Oh boy. Verizon logos on both sides of the device!

    • EC8CH

      If is just said “verizon” maybe it wouldn’t suck so much, but with the stupid check mark logo and the 4G LTE all spread out over the place it looks horrible.

      VZW’s marketing department should be kicked in the nuts for forcing phone manufactures to plaster their poorly laid out logos all over otherwise carefully designed phone exteriors.

      • NemaCystX

        Verizon just needs a new modern logo to go with the sporty looking LTE one

      • normmcgarry

        That checkmark looks like the big red-headed step child.

    • michael arazan

      Once you hold it in your hand the verizon sign burns into your skin branding you too

  • johnny bananas

    #FUGLY

    • fixxmyhead

      ugh, hashtag are u serious? is this like some gay twitter trend thing

    • DroidMan

      Hashtags? Really?

  • http://www.facebook.com/mike.aurin Mike Aurin

    Well, it’s not the ugliest thing I’ve seen come out of Motorola…

  • http://www.facebook.com/timothy.warne Tim Warne

    BGR has images of the black RAZR M.

  • http://twitter.com/Shane_Howell Shane Howell

    Fugly comes to mind.

    • NemaCystX

      My guess is, Verizon says “fork over the money if you want a nice looking device”

      Remember its not just the Manufacturers that design these things, the carriers “give input” on what they want them to look like too, some even go as far as making devices look completely different when its the same device on another carrier.

      Remember the original Galaxy S? the AT&T model was completely different than the other models, the Captivate.

  • KleenDroid

    Amazing